SRI MURUGENDRA MITHRA MANDALI vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER — WP/14266/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010309112026
Filing Number
WP/14138/2026
Filing Date
25-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/14266/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
B M Shyam Prasad
Coram
B M Shyam Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
( 85 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI MURUGENDRA MITHRA MANDALI
Adv. SHIVARAMA BHAT O
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
-
2.THE CEO
-
3.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
-
4.THE TAHASILDHAR
-
5.THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
6.PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
-
7.MR. OM PRASAD. B
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
Fresh Matter/S
B M Shyam Prasad
-
19-Jun-2026
B M Shyam PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WP 14266/2026 The High Court of Karnataka ordered that the jurisdictional Tahsildhar inspect the petitioner's property and file a report on measures required to protect it from alleged dangers caused by adjacent construction without proper setback. Notices were issued to all respondents returnable by 29.06.2026, with the case adjourned pending the Tahsildhar's report and responses from authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/14266/2026
Case Summary: WP 14266/2026 The High Court of Karnataka ordered that the jurisdictional Tahsildhar inspect the petitioner's property and file a report on measures required to protect it from alleged dangers caused by adjacent construction without proper setback. Notices were issued to all respondents returnable by 29.06.2026, with the case adjourned pending the Tahsildhar's report and responses from authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts