YAAHVI VENTURES vs M L PRAKASH RAO Advocate - AJAY J NANDALIKE — CRL.RP/131/2026

Case under None Section NONE. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010048962026

Filing Number

CRL.RP/136/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRL.RP/131/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Judge

H.p.sandesh

Coram

H.p.sandesh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.RP ( 114 )

Sub-Category

397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)-U/S 397/-U/S 438 ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

None Section NONE

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YAAHVI VENTURES

    Adv. MOHAN KUMAR M E

  2. 2.VASUDEVAMURTHY N

  3. 3.V. NEHAL

  4. 4.PADMAVATHI K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M L PRAKASH RAO Advocate - AJAY J NANDALIKE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    H.p.sandeshView PDF

    The Karnataka High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Yaahvi Ventures and partners against their conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court (dated 29.08.2024) and upheld by the appellate court (dated 24.10.2025). The dismissal was based on the petitioners' non-compliance with a conditional order dated 11.02.2026 requiring deposit of 50% of the fine amount within four weeks, which had not been fulfilled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jan-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    Registrar (Review And Statistics)

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.RP/131/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Karnataka High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Yaahvi Ventures and partners against their conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court (dated 29.08.2024) and upheld by the appellate court (dated 24.10.2025). The dismissal was based on the petitioners' non-compliance with a conditional order dated 11.02.2026 requiring deposit of 50% of the fine amount within four weeks, which had not been fulfilled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case