GOVIND RAM AJAY VAID vs RAHIS AHMED MIR — CPOWP/29/2014

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Mar-2014

CNR: JKHC020056242014

Filing Number

CPOWP/3693/2014

Filing Date

05-Mar-2014

Registration No

CPOWP/29/2014

Registration Date

05-Mar-2014

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

OWP. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVIND RAM AJAY VAID

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHIS AHMED MIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir found the respondents in recurring contempt for failing to comply with a 2014 court order directing them to register a case within two weeks—a direction left unimplemented for over 12 years. The court closed the contempt petition upon the respondent's counsel assuring compliance within one week, but warned that failure to comply would result in coercive measures and allow revival of the contempt petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

  4. 12-Nov-2025

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  5. 14-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

  6. 14-Oct-2025

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  7. 09-Jul-2025

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  8. 23-Apr-2025

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  9. 11-Mar-2025

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  10. 10-Apr-2023

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  11. 21-Dec-2022

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  12. 10-Oct-2022

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan Lal

  13. 25-Aug-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan LalView PDF

  14. 25-Aug-2022

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  15. 02-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

  16. 02-Jun-2022

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul

  17. 17-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji KoulView PDF

  18. 17-Mar-2022

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  19. 02-Feb-2022

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan Lal

  20. 22-Nov-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan LalView PDF

  21. 22-Nov-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  22. 13-Oct-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

  23. 13-Oct-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

  24. 13-Jul-2021

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF

  25. 13-Jul-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

  26. 06-Jul-2021

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF

  27. 06-Jul-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  28. 25-Mar-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  29. 05-Dec-2020

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  30. 23-Oct-2020

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta

  31. 21-Oct-2017

    For Orders After Notice

  32. 18-Mar-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 05-Mar-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPOWP/29/2014

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir found the respondents in recurring contempt for failing to comply with a 2014 court order directing them to register a case within two weeks—a direction left unimplemented for over 12 years. The court closed the contempt petition upon the respondent's counsel assuring compliance within one week, but warned that failure to comply would result in coercive measures and allow revival of the contempt petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case