M/S SAMRAT FERRO ALLOY P LTD. TH. SANDEEP GULATI KARMAN S JOHAL vs UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1606/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 03rd June 2026.
CNR: JKHC020030882026
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/2310/2026
Filing Date
25-05-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1606/2026
Registration Date
30-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO CHALLENGE TO THE GOVT. ORDERS AND SROS ( 29 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
03rd June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S SAMRAT FERRO ALLOY P LTD. TH. SANDEEP GULATI KARMAN S JOHAL
Respondent(s)
UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice |
Orders
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Case Summary: WP(C) No. 1606/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of Samrat Ferro Alloy's petition challenging an order restricting change of activity to warehousing without prior consent. Instead of adjudicating the substantive challenge, the court directed respondents to treat the petition as a representation and reconsider the petitioner's claim within four weeks under applicable rules and law, with a speaking order required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP(C) No. 1606/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of Samrat Ferro Alloy's petition challenging an order restricting change of activity to warehousing without prior consent. Instead of adjudicating the substantive challenge, the court directed respondents to treat the petition as a representation and reconsider the petitioner's claim within four weeks under applicable rules and law, with a speaking order required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts