M/S SAMRAT FERRO ALLOY P LTD. TH. SANDEEP GULATI KARMAN S JOHAL vs UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1606/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Jun-2026

CNR: JKHC020030882026

Filing Number

WP(C)/2310/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1606/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO CHALLENGE TO THE GOVT. ORDERS AND SROS ( 29 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SAMRAT FERRO ALLOY P LTD. TH. SANDEEP GULATI KARMAN S JOHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) No. 1606/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of Samrat Ferro Alloy's petition challenging an order restricting change of activity to warehousing without prior consent. Instead of adjudicating the substantive challenge, the court directed respondents to treat the petition as a representation and reconsider the petitioner's claim within four weeks under applicable rules and law, with a speaking order required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

  5. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1606/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) No. 1606/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of Samrat Ferro Alloy's petition challenging an order restricting change of activity to warehousing without prior consent. Instead of adjudicating the substantive challenge, the court directed respondents to treat the petition as a representation and reconsider the petitioner's claim within four weeks under applicable rules and law, with a speaking order required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case