RANBIR SINGH RANDHAWA AND ANOTHER HARNEET SINGH OBEROI vs UT OF J AND K TH HOME DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS — CRM(M)/199/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
CNR: JKHC020010762026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/274/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/199/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANBIR SINGH RANDHAWA AND ANOTHER HARNEET SINGH OBEROI
Respondent(s)
-
1.UT OF J AND K TH HOME DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
Case History
-
22-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jul-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
Case Summary: CRM(M) No. 199/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh adjourned the petition filed by Ranbir Singh Randhawa and another against UT of J&K and others. The court granted four weeks' time to respondents 1-5 to file their reply and listed the matter for next hearing on 22.07.2026. The Registry was directed to report on service of respondents 6-9. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
-
07-Apr-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/199/2026
Case Summary: CRM(M) No. 199/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh adjourned the petition filed by Ranbir Singh Randhawa and another against UT of J&K and others. The court granted four weeks' time to respondents 1-5 to file their reply and listed the matter for next hearing on 22.07.2026. The Registry was directed to report on service of respondents 6-9. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts