SHABEENA IBRAHIM MR. SAHIL PARVEZ KACHROO vs MIR USMAAN DISOOKI AND ANR. — CRM(M)/486/2023
Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010046742023
Filing Number
CRM(M)/1143/2023
Filing Date
13-Sep-2023
Registration No
CRM(M)/486/2023
Registration Date
13-Sep-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF PROCESS/PROCEEDING. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHABEENA IBRAHIM MR. SAHIL PARVEZ KACHROO
Respondent(s)
-
1.MIR USMAAN DISOOKI AND ANR.
Adv. MR. Z. A. QURESHI SR. ADV,MR. A. R. DAR AND MR. SHEIKH NISAR AHMAD 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
Case Summary: CRM(M) 486/2023 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed cognizance proceedings against petitioner Shabeena Ibrahim for defamation charges under IPC Sections 499-500, finding the trial court acted mechanically without examining whether any prima facie case existed. The court determined the complaint contained no specific allegation attributing any defamatory statement to the petitioner, who was merely impleaded as she acted as attorney for the opposing party in an underlying estate dispute, constituting abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
23-Apr-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
10-Mar-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
06-Mar-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M. K. Hanjura
-
06-Mar-2026
Revoked
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
06-Mar-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf Wani
-
09-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
07-Nov-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
17-Oct-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
09-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
02-Jun-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
12-Mar-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
16-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF
-
16-Dec-2024
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal
-
25-Oct-2024
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal
-
13-Sep-2024
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
29-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
-
29-Jul-2024
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta
-
17-May-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet GuptaView PDF
-
17-May-2024
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal
-
17-May-2024
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal
-
27-Mar-2024
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
08-Dec-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
08-Dec-2023
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta
-
04-Nov-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet GuptaView PDF
-
04-Nov-2023
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
15-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji KoulView PDF
-
15-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/486/2023
Case Summary: CRM(M) 486/2023 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed cognizance proceedings against petitioner Shabeena Ibrahim for defamation charges under IPC Sections 499-500, finding the trial court acted mechanically without examining whether any prima facie case existed. The court determined the complaint contained no specific allegation attributing any defamatory statement to the petitioner, who was merely impleaded as she acted as attorney for the opposing party in an underlying estate dispute, constituting abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts