SHABEENA IBRAHIM MR. SAHIL PARVEZ KACHROO vs MIR USMAAN DISOOKI AND ANR. — CRM(M)/486/2023
Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010046742023
Filing Number
CRM(M)/1143/2023
Filing Date
13-09-2023
Registration No
CRM(M)/486/2023
Registration Date
13-09-2023
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF PROCESS/PROCEEDING. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHABEENA IBRAHIM MR. SAHIL PARVEZ KACHROO
Respondent(s)
MIR USMAAN DISOOKI AND ANR.
Adv. MR. Z. A. QURESHI SR. ADV,MR. A. R. DAR AND MR. SHEIKH NISAR AHMAD 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-09-2023 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
| 06-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
| 15-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
Orders
Case Summary: CRM(M) 486/2023 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed cognizance proceedings against petitioner Shabeena Ibrahim for defamation charges under IPC Sections 499-500, finding the trial court acted mechanically without examining whether any prima facie case existed. The court determined the complaint contained no specific allegation attributing any defamatory statement to the petitioner, who was merely impleaded as she acted as attorney for the opposing party in an underlying estate dispute, constituting abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRM(M) 486/2023 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed cognizance proceedings against petitioner Shabeena Ibrahim for defamation charges under IPC Sections 499-500, finding the trial court acted mechanically without examining whether any prima facie case existed. The court determined the complaint contained no specific allegation attributing any defamatory statement to the petitioner, who was merely impleaded as she acted as attorney for the opposing party in an underlying estate dispute, constituting abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts