ABDUL MAJID KHAN AND ANR M/S M.Y.BHAT AND ASSOCIATES, HAMZA PRINCE BHAT AND URBA NASEER vs YASHA MUDGAL COMMR/SECTY TO TOURISM AND ORS — CCP(D) /33/2025
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 15. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: JKHC010045632025
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
CCP(D) /3382/2025
Filing Date
30-08-2025
Registration No
CCP(D) /33/2025
Registration Date
30-08-2025
Bench Type
DIVISION BENCH
Category
DB CONTEMPT PETITION COP ( 219 )
Sub-Category
LPA ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (LPA)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABDUL MAJID KHAN AND ANR M/S M.Y.BHAT AND ASSOCIATES, HAMZA PRINCE BHAT AND URBA NASEER
Respondent(s)
YASHA MUDGAL COMMR/SECTY TO TOURISM AND ORS
Hearing History
FOR ORDERS FRESH
FOR ORDERS(NON FRESH)
FOR ORDERS(NON FRESH)
FOR ORDERS(NON FRESH)
FOR ORDERS(NON FRESH)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-09-2025 | FOR ORDERS FRESH | |
| 30-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS(NON FRESH) | |
| 22-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS(NON FRESH) | |
| 01-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS(NON FRESH) | |
| 06-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS(NON FRESH) |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Srinagar adjourned the contempt petition (CCP(D) 33/2025) to 30.06.2026. The Court directed the Principal Director of Defence Estates Office to take up the matter with the Ministry of Defence to initiate the land acquisition process as previously ordered, rejecting Respondent No. 4's attempt to shift responsibility. The petitioners' counsel was also directed to substitute the relevant Union of India incumbents as party respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Srinagar adjourned the contempt petition (CCP(D) 33/2025) to 30.06.2026. The Court directed the Principal Director of Defence Estates Office to take up the matter with the Ministry of Defence to initiate the land acquisition process as previously ordered, rejecting Respondent No. 4's attempt to shift responsibility. The petitioners' counsel was also directed to substitute the relevant Union of India incumbents as party respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts