VIKRAM KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LILY SAHAY, ,ANKIT APURVA,RAHUL PANDEY,KASHISH TIWARY,ANKIT VISHAL,AKHOURI AWINASH KUMAR,ARPAN MISHRA,AJAY KUMAR SAH,INDRAJIT SINHA — JHHC10451432025
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010451432025
Filing Number
Cr.Rev./29790/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKRAM KUMAR
Adv. VINOD KUMAR SAHU,GAUTAM KUMAR,GAUTAM KUMAR, ,BIKRAM KUMAR SAH,ASHUTOSH KUMAR SINHA,GAUTAM KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LILY SAHAY, ,ANKIT APURVA,RAHUL PANDEY,KASHISH TIWARY,ANKIT VISHAL,AKHOURI AWINASH KUMAR,ARPAN MISHRA,AJAY KUMAR SAH,INDRAJIT SINHA
-
2.NILOY KUMAR JHA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Case Summary Vikram Kumar v. The State of Jharkhand & Niloy Kumar Jha (Criminal Revision Filing No. 29790 of 2025) The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed petitioner Vikram Kumar's interlocutory applications seeking exemption from surrender. The court rejected his claim that severe lower back pain constituted sufficient grounds for exemption under Rule 159 of the Jharkhand High Court Rules, 2001, finding it did not qualify as an exceptional circumstance. All related applications were consequently dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Case Summary Vikram Kumar v. The State of Jharkhand & Niloy Kumar Jha (Criminal Revision Filing No. 29790 of 2025) The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed petitioner Vikram Kumar's interlocutory applications seeking exemption from surrender. The court rejected his claim that severe lower back pain constituted sufficient grounds for exemption under Rule 159 of the Jharkhand High Court Rules, 2001, finding it did not qualify as an exceptional circumstance. All related applications were consequently dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts