SHANKAR YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RUBY PANDEY, ,RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA — JHHC10207212025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010207212025

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./14065/2025

Filing Date

24-Jun-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANKAR YADAV

    Adv. NITESH KUMAR,SUJATA KUMARI,SUJATA KUMARI, ,SUJATA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RUBY PANDEY, ,RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA

  2. 2.MANIKANT SINGH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  5. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary Shankar Yadav v. The State of Jharkhand (Cr. Revision No. 14065/2025) Petitioner Shankar Yadav sought exemption from surrender before the trial court, citing a compromise settlement with the opposite party. While a joint compromise petition was filed, the court rejected the application because Yadav defaulted on the second installment payment of ₹3 lakhs due on 14.04.2026, despite paying the first installment. The High Court held that non-compliance with compromise terms cannot exempt surrender in Complaint Case No. 446/2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 09-Jul-2025

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  7. 24-Jun-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Shankar Yadav v. The State of Jharkhand (Cr. Revision No. 14065/2025) Petitioner Shankar Yadav sought exemption from surrender before the trial court, citing a compromise settlement with the opposite party. While a joint compromise petition was filed, the court rejected the application because Yadav defaulted on the second installment payment of ₹3 lakhs due on 14.04.2026, despite paying the first installment. The High Court held that non-compliance with compromise terms cannot exempt surrender in Complaint Case No. 446/2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case