ARIF SHEKH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P. — A.B.A./2970/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 140(2),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010185822026

Filing Number

A.B.A./12151/2026

Filing Date

30-May-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2970/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 140(2),3(5),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARIF SHEKH

    Adv. ANKIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Arif Shekh's plea for anticipatory bail in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No.112 of 2025 involving kidnapping and extortion charges under Sections 140(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi found that the FIR contained allegations of kidnapping and extortion demand of Rs.4-5 lakhs, with the petitioner allegedly being an accomplice of Karim Ansari, and therefore did not grant the anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 30-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2970/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Arif Shekh's plea for anticipatory bail in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No.112 of 2025 involving kidnapping and extortion charges under Sections 140(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi found that the FIR contained allegations of kidnapping and extortion demand of Rs.4-5 lakhs, with the petitioner allegedly being an accomplice of Karim Ansari, and therefore did not grant the anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case