BABITA DEVI ALIAS PAYAL SINGH @ BABITA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA, ,BHASWAT PRAKASH,PRAN PRANAY — B.A./5494/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(I),238,3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 19th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010182362026
Filing Number
B.A./11854/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./5494/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABITA DEVI ALIAS PAYAL SINGH @ BABITA
Adv. ANKIT KUMAR
-
2.PAYAL KUMAR ROUT@ PAYAL ROUT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA, ,BHASWAT PRAKASH,PRAN PRANAY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 5494/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail plea of two women, Babita Devi and Payal Kumari Rout, accused of murdering Dilip Turi and disposing of his body. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary found the allegations serious, citing CCTV footage showing the petitioners with the deceased and co-accused moving toward the crime field, along with matching mobile phone location data, creating substantial risk of absconding and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5494/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 5494/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail plea of two women, Babita Devi and Payal Kumari Rout, accused of murdering Dilip Turi and disposing of his body. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary found the allegations serious, citing CCTV footage showing the petitioners with the deceased and co-accused moving toward the crime field, along with matching mobile phone location data, creating substantial risk of absconding and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts