KIRAN KUMARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA — B.A./5039/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 306,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010180842026

Filing Number

B.A./11726/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./5039/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 306,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRAN KUMARI

    Adv. LINA SHAKTI,SUPRIYA DAYAL,SUPRIYA DAYAL, ,ANURAG KASHYAP,SUPRIYA DAYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. No. 5039/2026 Kiran Kumari's bail petition in a Section 306 IPC case (abetment of suicide) was rejected by the Jharkhand High Court on 10.06.2026. This was her second bail application; the court found the serious nature of allegations and risks of absconding/evidence tampering justified continued detention, rejecting bail on the same grounds as the earlier December 2024 order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5039/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. No. 5039/2026 Kiran Kumari's bail petition in a Section 306 IPC case (abetment of suicide) was rejected by the Jharkhand High Court on 10.06.2026. This was her second bail application; the court found the serious nature of allegations and risks of absconding/evidence tampering justified continued detention, rejecting bail on the same grounds as the earlier December 2024 order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case