DHANANJAY SHUKLA @ DHANANJAY KUMAR SHUKLA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY — B.A./5058/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(I),238,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010178372026

Filing Number

B.A./11522/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./5058/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(I),238,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHANANJAY SHUKLA @ DHANANJAY KUMAR SHUKLA

    Adv. AMAN DAYAL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Dhananjay Shukla in his third bail application for charges under Sections 103(1) & 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court considered that five prosecution witnesses, including P.W.5, turned hostile and failed to support the case, the petitioner has no criminal record, and he had been in custody since November 2024. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties and conditions requiring cooperation with trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5058/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Dhananjay Shukla in his third bail application for charges under Sections 103(1) & 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court considered that five prosecution witnesses, including P.W.5, turned hostile and failed to support the case, the petitioner has no criminal record, and he had been in custody since November 2024. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties and conditions requiring cooperation with trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case