SANDIP KUZUR ALIAS SANDIP MUNDA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BISHAMBHAR SHASTRI — B.A./3751/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302/34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 05th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010139142026
Filing Number
B.A./8967/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3751/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANDIP KUZUR ALIAS SANDIP MUNDA
Adv. REKHANKA DEVI,NARESH PD THAKUR,NARESH PD THAKUR, ,SATISH KUMAR,NARESH PD THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BISHAMBHAR SHASTRI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected Sandip Kuzur's bail petition in a murder case (IPC §302/34). Though four co-accused received bail, the court found petitioner's case distinguishable due to direct allegations that he fired a country-made pistol at the victim and subsequently struck her face with stones, warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3751/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected Sandip Kuzur's bail petition in a murder case (IPC §302/34). Though four co-accused received bail, the court found petitioner's case distinguishable due to direct allegations that he fired a country-made pistol at the victim and subsequently struck her face with stones, warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts