DASRATH LOHRA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR — A.B.A./2318/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 303(2),317(5),3(5),BNS,4/21,MMDR,4/54,JMMC,7/9,JMPIMTS,R. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010136202026
Filing Number
A.B.A./8781/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2318/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MINES AND MINERALS ( 151 )
Sub-Category
Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development)Act 1957 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DASRATH LOHRA
Adv. KRIPA SHANKAR NANDA,RASHIKA BHARDWAJ,RASHIKA BHARDWAJ, ,NIRANJAN KR SINHA,RASHIKA BHARDWAJ
-
2.TEJU ORAON
-
3.DHARAMBIR ORAON
-
4.PANCHU ORAON
-
5.DEVTHU LOHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Dasrath Lohra, Teju Oraon, Dharambir Oraon, Panchu Oraon, and Devthu Lohra) in an illegal sand mining case. The court found that the petitioners' names appeared only on suspicion, the informant was not disclosed in the FIR, and they had no criminal antecedents. Each petitioner was ordered to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2318/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Dasrath Lohra, Teju Oraon, Dharambir Oraon, Panchu Oraon, and Devthu Lohra) in an illegal sand mining case. The court found that the petitioners' names appeared only on suspicion, the informant was not disclosed in the FIR, and they had no criminal antecedents. Each petitioner was ordered to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts