RAHUL THAKUR vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA — B.A./3695/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 70(1),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010133642026

Filing Number

B.A./8629/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3695/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 70(1),3(5),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL THAKUR

    Adv. AMIT KUMAR CHATURVEDI,RAJ SHEKHAR JHA,RAJ SHEKHAR JHA, ,RAJ SHEKHAR JHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. No. 3695/2026 Decision: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rahul Thakur on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties. The court found that the victim-informant turned hostile during examination, medical evidence showed no recent sexual activity or injury marks, and the petitioner had no criminal antecedent. The bail was granted subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, deposit of Aadhar and mobile number details, and cooperation with proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3695/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. No. 3695/2026 Decision: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rahul Thakur on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties. The court found that the victim-informant turned hostile during examination, medical evidence showed no recent sexual activity or injury marks, and the petitioner had no criminal antecedent. The bail was granted subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, deposit of Aadhar and mobile number details, and cooperation with proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case