BRIJ MOHAN SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI — WPC/3409/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010131982026
Filing Number
WPC/4696/2026
Filing Date
18-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPC/3409/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Jamabandi ( 229 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRIJ MOHAN SINGH
Adv. VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA,KM POONAM VERMA,KM POONAM VERMA, ,KM POONAM VERMA
-
2.ABHIMANYU KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER, NORTH CHHOTA NAGPUR DIVISION, HAZARIBAGH
-
3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHATRA
-
4.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, CHATRA
-
5.THE LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CHATRA
-
6.CIRCLE OFFICER, KUNDA
-
7.SHIV MOHAN PRASAD SAHU
-
8.SOHAN PRASAD SAHU
-
9.SURENDRA PRASAD SAHU
-
10.BADRI SINGH
-
11.KRISHNA MOHAN SINGH
-
12.RATAN SINGH
-
13.JITENDRA KUMAR SAUNDIK
-
14.RANJIT KUMAR SAUNDIK
-
15.MANOJ KUMAR SAUNDIK
-
16.AMIT KUMAR SAUNDIK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: WPC/3409/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the writ petition, holding that disputes regarding land title and ownership cannot be resolved through Article 226 writ jurisdiction. The court ruled that questions of right, title, and interest in land must be adjudicated in a civil suit before an appropriate Civil Court. The petitioners were directed to file a civil suit for declaration of their rights; upon favorable determination, they may then approach Revenue Authorities for consequential reliefs regarding land mutation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
18-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3409/2026
Case Summary: WPC/3409/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the writ petition, holding that disputes regarding land title and ownership cannot be resolved through Article 226 writ jurisdiction. The court ruled that questions of right, title, and interest in land must be adjudicated in a civil suit before an appropriate Civil Court. The petitioners were directed to file a civil suit for declaration of their rights; upon favorable determination, they may then approach Revenue Authorities for consequential reliefs regarding land mutation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts