HARERAM SINGH vs SAVITRI DEVI Advocate - GIRISH MOHAN SINGH, ,GIRISH MOHAN SINGH — C.R./25/2026
Case under Revision U/s 115 of C.p.c., 1908 Section 115. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010130212026
Filing Number
C.R./4616/2026
Filing Date
18-Apr-2026
Registration No
C.R./25/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Under Section 115 of C.P.C. ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARERAM SINGH
Adv. AKHOURI AWINASH KUMAR,INDRAJIT SINHA,INDRAJIT SINHA, ,KASHISH TIWARY,ASHWINI PRIYA,INDRAJIT SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAVITRI DEVI Advocate - GIRISH MOHAN SINGH, ,GIRISH MOHAN SINGH
-
2.ANIL KUMAR
-
3.NISHA KUMARI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
13-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: C.R. 25/2026 Court: High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad Date: 6th May 2026 The case was adjourned to 13th May 2026. The petitioner's counsel concluded arguments, and the opposite parties' counsel sought time to file a counter-affidavit and argue their case. The interim order dated 22.04.2026 continues in effect. Lower court records were called for, and the order was directed to be communicated to the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Orders(with defect)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
06-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C.R./25/2026
Case Summary: C.R. 25/2026 Court: High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad Date: 6th May 2026 The case was adjourned to 13th May 2026. The petitioner's counsel concluded arguments, and the opposite parties' counsel sought time to file a counter-affidavit and argue their case. The interim order dated 22.04.2026 continues in effect. Lower court records were called for, and the order was directed to be communicated to the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts