HARERAM SINGH vs SAVITRI DEVI Advocate - GIRISH MOHAN SINGH, ,GIRISH MOHAN SINGH — C.R./25/2026

Case under Revision U/s 115 of C.p.c., 1908 Section 115. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: JHHC010130212026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

C.R./4616/2026

Filing Date

18-04-2026

Registration No

C.R./25/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

Under Section 115 of C.P.C. ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

Revision U/s 115 of C.p.c., 1908 Section 115

Petitioner(s)

HARERAM SINGH

Adv. AKHOURI AWINASH KUMAR,INDRAJIT SINHA,INDRAJIT SINHA, ,KASHISH TIWARY,ASHWINI PRIYA,INDRAJIT SINHA

Respondent(s)

SAVITRI DEVI Advocate - GIRISH MOHAN SINGH, ,GIRISH MOHAN SINGH

ANIL KUMAR

NISHA KUMARI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

06-05-2026

Orders(with defect)

22-04-2026

Orders(with defect)

06-05-2026

Orders

13-05-2026

Orders

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

Case Summary: C.R. 25/2026 Court: High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad Date: 6th May 2026 The case was adjourned to 13th May 2026. The petitioner's counsel concluded arguments, and the opposite parties' counsel sought time to file a counter-affidavit and argue their case. The interim order dated 22.04.2026 continues in effect. Lower court records were called for, and the order was directed to be communicated to the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.R. 25/2026 Court: High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad Date: 6th May 2026 The case was adjourned to 13th May 2026. The petitioner's counsel concluded arguments, and the opposite parties' counsel sought time to file a counter-affidavit and argue their case. The interim order dated 22.04.2026 continues in effect. Lower court records were called for, and the order was directed to be communicated to the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case