VISHWAJEET SINGH vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR, ,ARVIND KUMAR SINGH,VIJAY BAHADUR SINGH — JHHC10129052025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010129052025

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./8764/2025

Filing Date

16-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHWAJEET SINGH

    Adv. AMRIT KUMAR SINGH,VANDANA KUMARI SINGH,VANDANA KUMARI SINGH, ,VANDANA KUMARI SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR, ,ARVIND KUMAR SINGH,VIJAY BAHADUR SINGH

  2. 2.NAVIN KUMAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  5. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary In Criminal Revision No. 8764 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petitioner's application to condone a 71-day delay in filing the revision application. However, the court rejected the petitioner's application for exemption from surrender, finding that he failed to adhere to a compromise settlement where only Rs. 3,25,000 of an agreed Rs. 6,00,000 was paid to opposite party Navin Kumar. The bail application was dismissed as infructuous following the rejection of the surrender exemption application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 12-Jun-2025

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  7. 16-Apr-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Criminal Revision No. 8764 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petitioner's application to condone a 71-day delay in filing the revision application. However, the court rejected the petitioner's application for exemption from surrender, finding that he failed to adhere to a compromise settlement where only Rs. 3,25,000 of an agreed Rs. 6,00,000 was paid to opposite party Navin Kumar. The bail application was dismissed as infructuous following the rejection of the surrender exemption application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case