LABAN KIRO vs THE RANCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS MINICIPAL COMMISSIONER Advocate - ANURAG KUMAR, ,DR. (MRS.) VANDANA SINGH,DR. (MRS.) VANDANA SINGH — WPC/1345/2021

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010107432021

Filing Number

WPC/1963/2021

Filing Date

18-Mar-2021

Registration No

WPC/1345/2021

Registration Date

24-Mar-2021

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MUNICIPALTIES ( 153 )

Sub-Category

Jharkhand Municipal Act 2011 ( 24 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LABAN KIRO

    Adv. MOHAN KR DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE RANCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS MINICIPAL COMMISSIONER Advocate - ANURAG KUMAR, ,DR. (MRS.) VANDANA SINGH,DR. (MRS.) VANDANA SINGH

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER RANCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  3. 3.THE TOWN PLANNER RANCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: WPC 1345/2021 (Laban Kiro v. Ranchi Municipal Corporation) The case was adjourned for six weeks to allow RMC to file an additional affidavit addressing the petitioner's concerns. The court ordered RMC to sanction the petitioner's building plan without demanding land as a gift, ruling that involuntary land cannot constitute a gift. RMC may acquire land only through lawful acquisition procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Jun-2023

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  4. 13-Jun-2023

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  5. 04-Aug-2021

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  6. 04-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1345/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC 1345/2021 (Laban Kiro v. Ranchi Municipal Corporation) The case was adjourned for six weeks to allow RMC to file an additional affidavit addressing the petitioner's concerns. The court ordered RMC to sanction the petitioner's building plan without demanding land as a gift, ruling that involuntary land cannot constitute a gift. RMC may acquire land only through lawful acquisition procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case