SANJAY MADAIYA ALIAS CHUNNU MADAIYA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NAVEEN KR GAUNJHU — B.A./3022/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(I),,103(I)61(2),303(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 12th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010103372026
Filing Number
B.A./6724/2026
Filing Date
26-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./3022/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY MADAIYA ALIAS CHUNNU MADAIYA
Adv. SUMIT GAUTAM,ANJANI KUMAR,ANJANI KUMAR, ,PRAMENDRA KUMAR MEHTA,ANJANI KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NAVEEN KR GAUNJHU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
SUMMARY: The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Sanjay Madaiya, who has been in custody since July 29, 2025, in connection with a homicide case under BNS Sections 103(1)/303(2). The court found direct allegations against the petitioner (the informant's son-in-law as the named accused) sufficient to deny bail, rejecting arguments of false implication and FIR filing delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3022/2026
SUMMARY: The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Sanjay Madaiya, who has been in custody since July 29, 2025, in connection with a homicide case under BNS Sections 103(1)/303(2). The court found direct allegations against the petitioner (the informant's son-in-law as the named accused) sufficient to deny bail, rejecting arguments of false implication and FIR filing delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts