ASHIM RAZA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SURAJ DEO MUNDA, ,AVILASH KUMAR — A.B.A./2019/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,126(2),115(2),117(2),109,324(4),352,351(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010095092026
Filing Number
A.B.A./6157/2026
Filing Date
20-Mar-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2019/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHIM RAZA
Adv. AVISHEK CHANDRA,JAY SHANKAR TIWARY,JAY SHANKAR TIWARY, ,JAY SHANKAR TIWARY
-
2.BABUJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SURAJ DEO MUNDA, ,AVILASH KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Ashim Raza and Babujan, who face charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, including allegations of molesting the informant. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi found that the FIR allegations were supported by witness statements in the case diary and considered the petitioners' significant criminal antecedents (four and three prior convictions respectively), determining that bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
27-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
07-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2019/2026
The Jharkhand High Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Ashim Raza and Babujan, who face charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, including allegations of molesting the informant. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi found that the FIR allegations were supported by witness statements in the case diary and considered the petitioners' significant criminal antecedents (four and three prior convictions respectively), determining that bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts