UDAY KANT PATHAK vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA — Cr.A(SJ)/313/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 406,409,419,420,423,424,467,468,471,120B,34,IPC,3(1)(v),4,SCSTPOA,3(2),r/w,13(1)(c),13(1)(d),PC,ACT. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: JHHC010068422026

Filing Number

Cr.A(SJ)/4534/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

Cr.A(SJ)/313/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CORRUPTION ( 120 )

Sub-Category

Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 406,409,419,420,423,424,467,468,471,120B,34,IPC,3(1)(v),4,SCSTPOA,3(2),r/w,13(1)(c),13(1)(d),PC,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UDAY KANT PATHAK

    Adv. RAJARSHI SARKAR,ROHAN MAZUMDAR,ROHAN MAZUMDAR, ,NAVEEN KUMAR,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,DIVYA CHOUDHARY,ROHAN MAZUMDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA

  2. 2.INDUSHEKHAR JHA

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Summary of Cr.A(SJ) No.313/2026 The court found that the State could not identify the specific crimes committed by the appellants or disclose any victims under the SC/ST (PoA) Act, yet persons remained in custody. The case was adjourned to 23.06.2026 with the State directed to come thoroughly prepared. Additionally, provisional bail was granted to Kumari Ratnakar for one month on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, considering her seven-year-old disabled daughter's care needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  5. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/313/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Cr.A(SJ) No.313/2026 The court found that the State could not identify the specific crimes committed by the appellants or disclose any victims under the SC/ST (PoA) Act, yet persons remained in custody. The case was adjourned to 23.06.2026 with the State directed to come thoroughly prepared. Additionally, provisional bail was granted to Kumari Ratnakar for one month on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, considering her seven-year-old disabled daughter's care needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case