RAMJEE PRASAD vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — JHHC10037642025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010037642025

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./2527/2025

Filing Date

31-Jan-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMJEE PRASAD

    Adv. ANKIT APURVA,BHASKAR KUMAR,BHASKAR KUMAR, ,BHANU KUMAR No.1,BHASKAR KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY

  2. 2.KAMESHWAR KUMAR SAW

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary In Criminal Revision Filing No. 2527 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand rejected petitioner Ramjee Prasad's interlocutory application seeking exemption from surrender based on claimed paralytic attack. The court found the medical prescriptions contradicted the petitioner's assertion, showing only difficulty in walking rather than paralysis. With no exceptional circumstances established, the court rejected the exemption prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  5. 07-May-2025

    Orders(with defect)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  6. 30-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  7. 22-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  8. 22-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  9. 19-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 31-Jan-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Criminal Revision Filing No. 2527 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand rejected petitioner Ramjee Prasad's interlocutory application seeking exemption from surrender based on claimed paralytic attack. The court found the medical prescriptions contradicted the petitioner's assertion, showing only difficulty in walking rather than paralysis. With no exceptional circumstances established, the court rejected the exemption prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case