MD. SONU ALIAS SAHID ANSARI ALIAS MD. SONU SAHID vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUSHMA AIND, ,KEHKASHAN AFSHEEN,PRAN PRANAY — B.A./1173/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 109,118(2),3(5),BNS,2023,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 27th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010030962026
Filing Number
B.A./2109/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
B.A./1173/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. SONU ALIAS SAHID ANSARI ALIAS MD. SONU SAHID
Adv. Md Ayub Ansari,ASHISH KUMAR,ASHISH KUMAR, ,ASHISH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUSHMA AIND, ,KEHKASHAN AFSHEEN,PRAN PRANAY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Summary The Jharkhand High Court rejected bail for Md. Sonu Ansari, who was charged with attempted murder under BNS sections 109/118(2)/3(5) and the Arms Act for allegedly firing at the informant's husband. The court found the allegations serious and determined there was substantial risk of absconding and evidence tampering, particularly given the petitioner's involvement in other criminal cases including a prior murder case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./1173/2026
Summary The Jharkhand High Court rejected bail for Md. Sonu Ansari, who was charged with attempted murder under BNS sections 109/118(2)/3(5) and the Arms Act for allegedly firing at the informant's husband. The court found the allegations serious and determined there was substantial risk of absconding and evidence tampering, particularly given the petitioner's involvement in other criminal cases including a prior murder case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts