KALPU SINGH ALIAS VISHAL KUMAR SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - TARUN KUMAR — A.B.A./1067/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),115(2),117(2),109,352,351(2),326(f),BNS,27,35,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 25th March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010029952026
Filing Number
A.B.A./2031/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./1067/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALPU SINGH ALIAS VISHAL KUMAR SINGH
Adv. MD. IMTIAZ KHAN,MD.MOBIN AHMAD,MD.MOBIN AHMAD, ,PANKAJ KUMAR JHA,MD.MOBIN AHMAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - TARUN KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Kalpu Singh, who was apprehending arrest for allegedly setting two vehicles on fire, threatening drivers, and possessing illegal arms under BNS 2023 and the Arms Act. The court found the allegations serious, noted the petitioner's criminal antecedent, and determined that the facts and circumstances did not warrant granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
11-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
25-Feb-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./1067/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Kalpu Singh, who was apprehending arrest for allegedly setting two vehicles on fire, threatening drivers, and possessing illegal arms under BNS 2023 and the Arms Act. The court found the allegations serious, noted the petitioner's criminal antecedent, and determined that the facts and circumstances did not warrant granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts