SANGITA DEVI vs GANESH YADAV Advocate - BHAWESH KUMAR TIWARY, ,SANTOSH KUMAR,ALOK LAL,VIKASH ANAND,NILESH KUMAR GUPTA — MA/8/2024

Case under An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

CNR: JHHC010008272024

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

MA/221/2024

Filing Date

10-01-2024

Registration No

MA/8/2024

Registration Date

11-01-2024

Judge

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Coram

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MOTOR VEHICLE ( 152 )

Sub-Category

Compensation Matter ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

SANGITA DEVI

Adv. GAURAV KUMAR

JYOTI KUMARI

Respondent(s)

GANESH YADAV Advocate - BHAWESH KUMAR TIWARY, ,SANTOSH KUMAR,ALOK LAL,VIKASH ANAND,NILESH KUMAR GUPTA

BRANCH MANAGER BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

30-01-2024

LAWAZIMA

Orders

10-04-2026
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the appeal by upholding a settlement agreement between the appellants (widow and minor daughter of a deceased) and Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company. The court directed the insurance company to pay Rs. 4,00,000 as full and final settlement (in addition to Rs. 18,00,000 already paid), with the amount to be transferred directly to the appellant's bank account through the MACT registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the appeal by upholding a settlement agreement between the appellants (widow and minor daughter of a deceased) and Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company. The court directed the insurance company to pay Rs. 4,00,000 as full and final settlement (in addition to Rs. 18,00,000 already paid), with the amount to be transferred directly to the appellant's bank account through the MACT registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case