MONIKA VERMA(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/20445/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010716482025

Filing Number

CWP/60672/2025

Filing Date

19-Nov-2025

Registration No

CWP/20445/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MONIKA VERMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Prem Chand

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Rajesh Kosh,Komal Chaudhary,AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed petitioner Monika Verma's writ petition and held that the State's promotion order conferring regularization with immediate effect from notification date (rather than from the date she assumed charge on placement basis) was discriminatory and invalid. The court directed that the petitioner be granted regularization benefits from the actual date of joining as Principal on placement basis, with all consequential benefits, applying the same relief granted to similarly-situated employees in the earlier Vijay Parmar case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 31-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  5. 31-Dec-2025

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  6. 19-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/20445/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed petitioner Monika Verma's writ petition and held that the State's promotion order conferring regularization with immediate effect from notification date (rather than from the date she assumed charge on placement basis) was discriminatory and invalid. The court directed that the petitioner be granted regularization benefits from the actual date of joining as Principal on placement basis, with all consequential benefits, applying the same relief granted to similarly-situated employees in the earlier Vijay Parmar case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case