SUDARSHAN DEVI AND ORS(Not Applicable) vs DC SHIMLA AND ORS(Not Applicable) — LPA/830/2025
Case under Delhi High Court Act, 1966 Section C10. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010695042025
Filing Number
LPA/58794/2025
Filing Date
12-11-2025
Registration No
LPA/830/2025
Registration Date
04-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUDARSHAN DEVI AND ORS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Surinder Kumar Saklani
VASUNDRA(Not Applicable)
RICHA(Not Applicable)
PANKAJ KUMAR(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
DC SHIMLA AND ORS(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Janesh Gupta 1123
sun divisional collector(Not Applicable)
THE KHADEEN COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURE SERVICE TAKSAL MOJA DANGIYAR(Not Applicable)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-01-2026 | NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION |
| 04-05-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 12-03-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 27-02-2026 | NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION |
Orders
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the appeal on 04.05.2026, accepting the appellants' undertaking to vacate the rented premises by 31.03.2027. The court ordered the ₹78,000 deposit (covering arrears and future rent) to be released to respondent No.3, with a warning that failure to vacate would result in penal consequences and contempt of court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the appeal on 04.05.2026, accepting the appellants' undertaking to vacate the rented premises by 31.03.2027. The court ordered the ₹78,000 deposit (covering arrears and future rent) to be released to respondent No.3, with a warning that failure to vacate would result in penal consequences and contempt of court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts