KIRAN BALA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/9089/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010361502026

Filing Number

CWP/31448/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

CWP/9089/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRAN BALA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vinod Chauhan,Aanchal Singh,Aanchal Singh, ,Nandita,Aanchal Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG,Surinder Kumar Sharma 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Summary: CWP No. 9089/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Kiran Bala's petition challenging the election of respondent No. 9 as Pradhan of Gram Panchayat Nainidhar, District Sirmaur. The court held that the writ petition was not maintainable because statutory remedies are available under Sections 162 and 175 of the H.P. Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, and directed the petitioner to pursue the appropriate statutory remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9089/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CWP No. 9089/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Kiran Bala's petition challenging the election of respondent No. 9 as Pradhan of Gram Panchayat Nainidhar, District Sirmaur. The court held that the writ petition was not maintainable because statutory remedies are available under Sections 162 and 175 of the H.P. Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, and directed the petitioner to pursue the appropriate statutory remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case