RENU CHANDEL(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/8498/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010332902026

Filing Number

CWP/28966/2026

Filing Date

23-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/8498/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RENU CHANDEL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Reeta Hingmang,Mridul Nag,Mridul Nag, ,Vishwakirti Singh Rajput,Mridul Nag

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Vishwajeet Singh,AG 1123

  2. 2.Director(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Himachal Pradesh Rajya Chayan Ayog,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  3. 26-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: Renu Chandel challenged the rejection of her candidature for an English Teacher position advertised by Himachal Pradesh. The court found prima facie merit in her argument that she met the advertised eligibility criteria (MA English, 50% marks in graduation with B.Ed, and 55% in English at graduation level), but was arbitrarily rejected based on a three-year aggregate requirement not mentioned in the advertisement. The case was adjourned to June 1, 2026, with respondents directed to file complete instructions explaining the rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 26-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  5. 23-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8498/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Renu Chandel challenged the rejection of her candidature for an English Teacher position advertised by Himachal Pradesh. The court found prima facie merit in her argument that she met the advertised eligibility criteria (MA English, 50% marks in graduation with B.Ed, and 55% in English at graduation level), but was arbitrarily rejected based on a three-year aggregate requirement not mentioned in the advertisement. The case was adjourned to June 1, 2026, with respondents directed to file complete instructions explaining the rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case