THE DISTRICT AYUSH OFFICER BILASPUR(Not Applicable) vs BANGALI RAM(Not Applicable) — CWP/9784/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.
CNR: HPHC010296292026
Filing Number
CWP/25793/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/9784/2026
Registration Date
18-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE DISTRICT AYUSH OFFICER BILASPUR(Not Applicable)
Adv. Pawanish Kumar Shukla
Respondent(s)
-
1.BANGALI RAM(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.The Deputy Labour Commissioner-cum-Appellate Authority(Not Applicable)
-
3.The controlling Authority(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the District AYUSH Officer Bilaspur's petition challenging the Deputy Labour Commissioner's order directing gratuity payment to respondent Bangali Ram under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The court found the case facts analogous to previously decided cases (Bindumati and Binu Ram) involving identical legal issues and dismissed the petition following the reasoning established in those precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Office Objection
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/9784/2026
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the District AYUSH Officer Bilaspur's petition challenging the Deputy Labour Commissioner's order directing gratuity payment to respondent Bangali Ram under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The court found the case facts analogous to previously decided cases (Bindumati and Binu Ram) involving identical legal issues and dismissed the petition following the reasoning established in those precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts