BHARTI KASHYAP(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/9014/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010251832026

Filing Number

CWP/21902/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/9014/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARTI KASHYAP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Nishant Khidtta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Sandeep Kumar Pandey,AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed Bharti Kashyap's writ petition seeking mandamus to compel a college to provide her educational documents and testimonials. The court held that since the petitioner had already filed Civil Suit No. 115/1 of 2024 in Solan District Court seeking identical relief, she cannot pursue two parallel remedies for the same claim, and the pending civil suit made it inappropriate to entertain the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9014/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed Bharti Kashyap's writ petition seeking mandamus to compel a college to provide her educational documents and testimonials. The court held that since the petitioner had already filed Civil Suit No. 115/1 of 2024 in Solan District Court seeking identical relief, she cannot pursue two parallel remedies for the same claim, and the pending civil suit made it inappropriate to entertain the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case