The Executive Engineer JAL SHAKTI Division Nagrota Bagwan District Kangra HP(Not Applicable) Deputy Advocate General vs Bidhi Chand(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO — CWP/6538/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010251232026

e-Filing Number

24-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/21848/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/6538/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Executive Engineer JAL SHAKTI Division Nagrota Bagwan District Kangra HP(Not Applicable) Deputy Advocate General

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bidhi Chand(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the State's petition challenging a Deputy Labour Commissioner's order dated 17.10.2025 that directed payment of gratuity to respondent Bidhi Chand under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The court found the legal issues identical to those settled in prior cases (Binu Ram and Bindumati) and upheld the gratuity award accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6538/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the State's petition challenging a Deputy Labour Commissioner's order dated 17.10.2025 that directed payment of gratuity to respondent Bidhi Chand under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The court found the legal issues identical to those settled in prior cases (Binu Ram and Bindumati) and upheld the gratuity award accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case