PRIYANKA SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs SNEH KUTHIALA(Not Applicable) Advocate - Ganesh Barowalia — CR/40/2026

Case under Urban Rent Cotrol Act, 1987 Section 24(5). Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

Next hearing 22-May-2026

CNR: HPHC010106412026

Filing Number

CR/9016/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

CR/40/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Urban Rent Cotrol Act, 1987 Section 24(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRIYANKA SHARMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rakesh Manta,Topender Kumar Verma,Topender Kumar Verma, ,Topender Kumar Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SNEH KUTHIALA(Not Applicable) Advocate - Ganesh Barowalia

Case History

  1. 22-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the application (CMP No.7159 of 2026) and stayed execution of the eviction order dated 22.05.2025 passed by the Rent Controller. The tenant (Priyanka Sharma) must deposit monthly use and occupation charges of Rs. 3,000 from the date of eviction till date and during the revision petition's pendency, with arrears due within four weeks. The caveat petition was discharged and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/40/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application (CMP No.7159 of 2026) and stayed execution of the eviction order dated 22.05.2025 passed by the Rent Controller. The tenant (Priyanka Sharma) must deposit monthly use and occupation charges of Rs. 3,000 from the date of eviction till date and during the revision petition's pendency, with arrears due within four weeks. The caveat petition was discharged and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case