NAND BAHADUR(Not Applicable) vs THE HPSFC AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — EX.P./474/2026
Case under High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: HPHC010057112026
Filing Number
EX.P./4734/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
EX.P./474/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAND BAHADUR(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ashwani Gupta,Abhendra Gupta,Abhendra Gupta, ,Abhendra Gupta
Respondent(s)
THE HPSFC AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Kiran Dhiman 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: EX.P. 474/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Nand Bahadur's execution petition after finding that the H.P. State Forest Corporation had complied with the court's earlier mandate by granting the petitioner work-charge status effective January 1, 2000, as evidenced by an office order dated October 9, 2025. Since the judgment's mandate had been fully executed, the court found no remaining adjudication necessary and closed the matter, while reserving the petitioner's right to seek further remedies if aggrieved by the office order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: EX.P. 474/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Nand Bahadur's execution petition after finding that the H.P. State Forest Corporation had complied with the court's earlier mandate by granting the petitioner work-charge status effective January 1, 2000, as evidenced by an office order dated October 9, 2025. Since the judgment's mandate had been fully executed, the court found no remaining adjudication necessary and closed the matter, while reserving the petitioner's right to seek further remedies if aggrieved by the office order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts