State of West Bengal vs Raju Goswami and another — 481/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBPU060007442024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

743/2024

Filing Date

07-08-2024

Registration No

481/2024

Registration Date

07-08-2024

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia

Judge

5-ACJM II

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

SANTALDIH

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,506,34

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. Ld.A.P.P

Respondent(s)

Raju Goswami and another

Hearing History

Judge: 5-ACJM II

23-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

31-12-2025

Evidence

12-11-2025

Evidence

17-10-2025

Charge / Plea Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Daliy Order
23-03-2026
Judgement

Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur (West Bengal) acquitted accused Raju Goswami and Perki Goswami of charges under IPC sections 498A (cruelty by husband/relatives), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 34 (common intention). The court found that the prosecution witnesses (the complainant herself and her mother) failed to substantiate allegations of physical/mental torture, assault, and threats related to dowry demands, instead only testifying to a general matrimonial dispute. Since the prosecution could not prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, both accused were acquitted and discharged from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

25-10-2024
Daliy Order
20-01-2025
Daliy Order
10-04-2025
Daliy Order
17-10-2025
Daliy Order
12-11-2025
Daliy Order
09-03-2026
Daliy Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur (West Bengal) acquitted accused Raju Goswami and Perki Goswami of charges under IPC sections 498A (cruelty by husband/relatives), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 34 (common intention). The court found that the prosecution witnesses (the complainant herself and her mother) failed to substantiate allegations of physical/mental torture, assault, and threats related to dowry demands, instead only testifying to a general matrimonial dispute. Since the prosecution could not prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, both accused were acquitted and discharged from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case