State of West Bengal vs Raju Goswami and another — 481/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBPU060007442024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
743/2024
Filing Date
07-08-2024
Registration No
481/2024
Registration Date
07-08-2024
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia
Judge
5-ACJM II
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
SANTALDIH
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. Ld.A.P.P
Respondent(s)
Raju Goswami and another
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ACJM II
Disposed
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Evidence
Evidence
Charge / Plea Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 31-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 12-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 17-10-2025 | Charge / Plea Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur (West Bengal) acquitted accused Raju Goswami and Perki Goswami of charges under IPC sections 498A (cruelty by husband/relatives), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 34 (common intention). The court found that the prosecution witnesses (the complainant herself and her mother) failed to substantiate allegations of physical/mental torture, assault, and threats related to dowry demands, instead only testifying to a general matrimonial dispute. Since the prosecution could not prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, both accused were acquitted and discharged from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur (West Bengal) acquitted accused Raju Goswami and Perki Goswami of charges under IPC sections 498A (cruelty by husband/relatives), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 34 (common intention). The court found that the prosecution witnesses (the complainant herself and her mother) failed to substantiate allegations of physical/mental torture, assault, and threats related to dowry demands, instead only testifying to a general matrimonial dispute. Since the prosecution could not prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, both accused were acquitted and discharged from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts