Goutam Kumar Banerjee and Anr vs Dipak Kumar Paul and Anr — 300/2025
Case under The West Bengal Premises Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1978 Section 6. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
EJ - EJECTMENT SUITS
CNR: WBPS010005752025
Filing Number
626/2025
Filing Date
08-Sep-2025
Registration No
300/2025
Registration Date
08-Sep-2025
Court
Presidency Small Causes Court
Judge
3-3Rd Bench
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Goutam Kumar Banerjee and Anr
Adv. Sridipta Roy Chowdhury
-
2.Rajasi Banerjee
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dipak Kumar Paul and Anr
-
2.Dilip Paul
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-May-2026
orderView PDF
Case Summary: Ejectment Suit No. 300/2025 The court held the defendant is not a defaulter in rent payment since March 2018, disposing of the Section 7(2) petition under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997. The defendant's written statement was accepted, and he must continue monthly rent payments as previously directed. The issue of whether the defendant qualifies as a "subsequent defaulter" remains open for final hearing on 12.06.2026 for framing of issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
Issues
3Rd Bench
-
27-Apr-2026
orderView PDF
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2
3Rd Bench
-
09-Apr-2026
orderView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Chief Bench
-
12-Mar-2026
orderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2
Chief Bench
-
23-Feb-2026
orderView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2
Chief Bench
-
10-Feb-2026
orderView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2
Chief Bench
-
09-Jan-2026
orderView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2
Chief Bench
-
25-Nov-2025
orderView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 300/2025
Case Summary: Ejectment Suit No. 300/2025 The court held the defendant is not a defaulter in rent payment since March 2018, disposing of the Section 7(2) petition under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997. The defendant's written statement was accepted, and he must continue monthly rent payments as previously directed. The issue of whether the defendant qualifies as a "subsequent defaulter" remains open for final hearing on 12.06.2026 for framing of issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts