Priyanath Neogy and Anr vs Krishna Chowdhury alias Krishna Roy Chowdhuryand Ors — 101/2025
Case under The West Bengal Premises Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1978 Section 6. Status: Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
EJ - EJECTMENT SUITS
CNR: WBPS010002392025
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
Filing Number
259/2025
Filing Date
05-05-2025
Registration No
101/2025
Registration Date
05-05-2025
Court
Presidency Small Causes Court
Judge
1-CHIEF BENCH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Priyanath Neogy and Anr
Adv. Ashok Kumar. Roy
Sujata Neogy
Respondent(s)
Krishna Chowdhury alias Krishna Roy Chowdhuryand Ors
Mina Chowdhury
Radha Banerjee
Gita Das
Tapas Rot Chowdhury
Ashis Roy Chowdhury
Debasish Roy Chowdhury
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CHIEF BENCH
Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2
Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2
Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2
Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2
Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2 |
| 20-01-2026 | Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2 |
| 19-11-2025 | Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2 |
| 08-09-2025 | Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2 |
| 12-08-2025 | Hearing of Petition U/S 7/2 |
Interim Orders
Summary The defendant's petition seeking correction of a landlord's name in Rent Control challans (from "Shib Sankar Gupta" to "Priyanath Neogy" for the period March 2021-October 2022) was disposed of and rejected. The court held that corrections to documents can only be made by the issuing authority, not by the court, and that the inherent powers under Section 151 CPC do not apply here. The case is adjourned to 05/05/2026 for hearing of the main application under the W.B.P.T. Act, with the defendant free to pursue correction through appropriate channels independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The defendant's petition seeking correction of a landlord's name in Rent Control challans (from "Shib Sankar Gupta" to "Priyanath Neogy" for the period March 2021-October 2022) was disposed of and rejected. The court held that corrections to documents can only be made by the issuing authority, not by the court, and that the inherent powers under Section 151 CPC do not apply here. The case is adjourned to 05/05/2026 for hearing of the main application under the W.B.P.T. Act, with the defendant free to pursue correction through appropriate channels independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts