The Hanuman Estates Ltd. vs Arvind Newar — 86/2023
Case under All Section 6. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on contest. on 12th March 2026.
EJ - EJECTMENT SUITS
CNR: WBPS010001862023
Filing Number
199/2023
Filing Date
13-04-2023
Registration No
86/2023
Registration Date
13-04-2023
Court
Presidency Small Causes Court
Judge
2-2ND BENCH
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed on contest.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Hanuman Estates Ltd.
Adv. Soumitra Chakrabavarty
Respondent(s)
Arvind Newar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2ND BENCH
Disposed
Argument / Further Argument
Argument / Further Argument
Further Evidence
Further Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 10-02-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 07-11-2025 | Further Evidence |
| 08-09-2025 | Further Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The Hanuman Estates Ltd. v. Arvind Newar (86/2023) The Presidency Small Cause Court, Calcutta dismissed The Hanuman Estates Ltd.'s ejectment suit against Arvind Newar. The court found the suit unmaintainable because the plaintiff failed to establish a valid landlord-tenant relationship with the defendant—a prerequisite for eviction proceedings. Additionally, the plaintiff did not properly serve the mandatory one-month eviction notice required under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, and could not substantiate its claims regarding grounds for eviction, such as subletting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The Hanuman Estates Ltd. v. Arvind Newar (86/2023) The Presidency Small Cause Court, Calcutta dismissed The Hanuman Estates Ltd.'s ejectment suit against Arvind Newar. The court found the suit unmaintainable because the plaintiff failed to establish a valid landlord-tenant relationship with the defendant—a prerequisite for eviction proceedings. Additionally, the plaintiff did not properly serve the mandatory one-month eviction notice required under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, and could not substantiate its claims regarding grounds for eviction, such as subletting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts