State of West Bengal vs Sukanta Mondal alias Sukhanta Mondal — 320/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBNP010010832026

Filing Number

581/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

320/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1234

Police Station

GAIGHATA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sukanta Mondal alias Sukhanta Mondal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The North 24 Parganas Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Sukanta Mondal, Jiban Mondal, Dipankar Mondal, and Milan Das) in a criminal case involving allegations of criminal intimidation and assault. The court found that injury reports and case materials did not support custodial interrogation and that the complaint appeared motivated by previous neighborhood disputes. Bail was granted on conditions including furnishing bonds of Rs.5,000 each with sureties, non-interference with witnesses, and appearance before the lower court within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 320/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The North 24 Parganas Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Sukanta Mondal, Jiban Mondal, Dipankar Mondal, and Milan Das) in a criminal case involving allegations of criminal intimidation and assault. The court found that injury reports and case materials did not support custodial interrogation and that the complaint appeared motivated by previous neighborhood disputes. Bail was granted on conditions including furnishing bonds of Rs.5,000 each with sureties, non-interference with witnesses, and appearance before the lower court within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case