MAFUJ SK vs State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP — 1166/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBMD010021022026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1812/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

1166/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

78

Police Station

HARIHARPARA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

MAFUJ SK

Adv. Rahul Sk

Respondent(s)

State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

25-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

Hearing

13-03-2026

Hearing

09-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad rejected the bail application filed by Mafuj Sk under Section 483 of BNSS in a case involving charges under Sections 85/92 of BNS. The accused, who is the husband of the alleged victim, was charged with assaulting the victim by kicking her abdomen, resulting in termination of her 8-month pregnancy. After reviewing witness statements, the victim's statement, and medical documents on record, the court found the nature of allegations and available materials established the accused's involvement in the alleged offense, making it unfit to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Order
24-03-2026
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad rejected the bail application filed by Mafuj Sk under Section 483 of BNSS in a case involving charges under Sections 85/92 of BNS. The accused, who is the husband of the alleged victim, was charged with assaulting the victim by kicking her abdomen, resulting in termination of her 8-month pregnancy. After reviewing witness statements, the victim's statement, and medical documents on record, the court found the nature of allegations and available materials established the accused's involvement in the alleged offense, making it unfit to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case