Ohida Bibi and 02 others vs State of West Bengal — 239/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBEM010012302026

Filing Number

724/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

239/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

PURBA MEDINIPUR BHAGAWANPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ohida Bibi and 02 others

    Adv. DIPANKAR CHANDRA

  2. 2.Rinki Bibi @ Seimuna Khatun

  3. 3.Jyotsna Bibi @ Josna Bibi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 239/2026 Summary The Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for Ohida Bibi, finding prima facie evidence that she inflicted a head injury (requiring eight stitches) on the complainant with a 'katan'. However, anticipatory bail was granted to Rinki Bibi @ Seimuna Khatun and Jyotsna Bibi @ Josna Bibi, as their custodial interrogation was deemed unnecessary for investigation. The latter two were granted bail on Rs. 3,000 bond each with sureties, conditional on surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 239/2026 Summary The Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for Ohida Bibi, finding prima facie evidence that she inflicted a head injury (requiring eight stitches) on the complainant with a 'katan'. However, anticipatory bail was granted to Rinki Bibi @ Seimuna Khatun and Jyotsna Bibi @ Josna Bibi, as their custodial interrogation was deemed unnecessary for investigation. The latter two were granted bail on Rs. 3,000 bond each with sureties, conditional on surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case