Kajal Mishra and another vs State of West Bengal — 162/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBEM010008612026

Filing Number

509/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

162/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kajal Mishra and another

    Adv. Shri Bidarba Ray

  2. 2.Kalipada Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Kajal Mishra and Kalipada Mishra (parents-in-law of the complainant) after finding insufficient evidence of their involvement in the alleged offences under Section 109 of B.N.S., concluding they were falsely implicated. The accused were released on bail of Rs. 4,000 each with a registered surety, on condition they surrender before the A.C.J.M., Contai within two weeks, failing which the bail order would be automatically cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 162/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Kajal Mishra and Kalipada Mishra (parents-in-law of the complainant) after finding insufficient evidence of their involvement in the alleged offences under Section 109 of B.N.S., concluding they were falsely implicated. The accused were released on bail of Rs. 4,000 each with a registered surety, on condition they surrender before the A.C.J.M., Contai within two weeks, failing which the bail order would be automatically cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case