ABUSATTAR SK. AND OTHERS vs State of West Bengal — 269/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBD010006482026

Filing Number

419/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

269/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Burdwan

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABUSATTAR SK. AND OTHERS

    Adv. SIMA SAMADDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    ordersView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge, Purba Bardhaman rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by six accused persons (Abu Sattar Sk. and others) under Section 482 B.N.S.S. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused fraudulently extracted money from multiple persons by promising government jobs and issuing fake appointment letters, making pre-arrest bail unsuitable given the gravity of the offence and their involvement in the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    ordersView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/petition

    District Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    ordersView PDF

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/petition

    District Judge

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 269/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge, Purba Bardhaman rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by six accused persons (Abu Sattar Sk. and others) under Section 482 B.N.S.S. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused fraudulently extracted money from multiple persons by promising government jobs and issuing fake appointment letters, making pre-arrest bail unsuitable given the gravity of the offence and their involvement in the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case