Rajkumar vs Uttar Pradesh Sarkar Advocate - DGC Criminal — 761/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305A,331(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSI010017592026

Filing Number

1655/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

761/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

RAUSA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305A,331(4),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajkumar

    Adv. Aditya Kumar Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh Sarkar Advocate - DGC Criminal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Copy of bail orderView PDF

    Case 761/2026 Summary The District and Sessions Court, Sitapur granted bail to accused Raj Kumar in a theft case (Crime No. 20/2026) under BNS sections 305(A), 331(4), and 317(2). The court found reasonable grounds for bail based on several weaknesses in the prosecution's case: the accused was not named in the FIR (lodged against unknown persons), no independent eyewitnesses were present at the crime or recovery, the complainant was not an eyewitness, and no witnesses were cited in the recovery memo. The accused, who had been in jail since March 1, 2026, has no prior convictions. He was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 761/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 761/2026 Summary The District and Sessions Court, Sitapur granted bail to accused Raj Kumar in a theft case (Crime No. 20/2026) under BNS sections 305(A), 331(4), and 317(2). The court found reasonable grounds for bail based on several weaknesses in the prosecution's case: the accused was not named in the FIR (lodged against unknown persons), no independent eyewitnesses were present at the crime or recovery, the complainant was not an eyewitness, and no witnesses were cited in the recovery memo. The accused, who had been in jail since March 1, 2026, has no prior convictions. He was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case