Manoj Singh vs State Government — 670/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPHR010015162026

Filing Number

1462/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

670/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Special Judge SC And ST Act

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

367

Police Station

KACHHAUNA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(2)(va),3(1)(r)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manoj Singh

    Adv. DHIRENDRA KUMAR BAJPAI

  2. 2.Babu Ali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The court ordered accused Manoj and Babu Ali to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each without custodial remand, following High Court directions that where charge-sheets are filed without arrest, accused need not be remanded to judicial custody or required to file formal bail applications. The court noted that as the accused were not taken into custody, no notice to the complainant-victim was required at this stage, though their right to be heard in future bail proceedings remains preserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge SC And ST Act

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 670/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court ordered accused Manoj and Babu Ali to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each without custodial remand, following High Court directions that where charge-sheets are filed without arrest, accused need not be remanded to judicial custody or required to file formal bail applications. The court noted that as the accused were not taken into custody, no notice to the complainant-victim was required at this stage, though their right to be heard in future bail proceedings remains preserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case