State of U.P. vs Vijay bahadur singh and others — 18/2018

Case under Gangster Section 3(1). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

SPECIAL TRIAL

CNR: UPCD010021722018

Appearance

Next Hearing

29th May 2026

Filing Number

18/2018

Filing Date

07-09-2018

Registration No

18/2018

Registration Date

07-09-2018

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

6-Addl. District and Session Judge FTC-II

FIR Details

FIR Number

198

Police Station

SAKALDIHA

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Gangster Section 3(1)

Petitioner(s)

State of U.P.

Adv. DGC

Respondent(s)

Vijay bahadur singh and others

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Addl. District and Session Judge FTC-II

27-04-2026

Appearance

12-03-2026

Appearance

28-01-2026

Appearance

27-11-2025

Appearance

17-10-2025

Appearance

Interim Orders

28-01-2026
Order

Case 18/2018 Summary: The State of U.P. filed a petition against Vijay Bahadur Singh and Manindra Singh in a Gangsters Act case (FIR 198/2017, Sakaldiha Police Station, Chandauli). The accused had obtained protective orders from the High Court restraining arrest until submission of the police charge-sheet. The court accepted the petition and granted bail to both accused on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-involvement in other crimes. The accused are bound by the findings of a referenced Supreme Court judgment on protective orders continuing through trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 18/2018 Summary: The State of U.P. filed a petition against Vijay Bahadur Singh and Manindra Singh in a Gangsters Act case (FIR 198/2017, Sakaldiha Police Station, Chandauli). The accused had obtained protective orders from the High Court restraining arrest until submission of the police charge-sheet. The court accepted the petition and granted bail to both accused on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-involvement in other crimes. The accused are bound by the findings of a referenced Supreme Court judgment on protective orders continuing through trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case