Rafiullshan and others vs Abdul Gufur and others — 104/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 09th March 2026 Date Not Updated.
Civil Suit
CNR: UPBJ180001602020
Next Hearing
09th March 2026 Date Not Updated
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
143/2020
Filing Date
27-01-2020
Registration No
104/2020
Registration Date
27-01-2020
Court
Civil Judge Junior DIvision, Nagina
Judge
3-Addl Civil Judge (J.D.) Court No-2
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rafiullshan and others
Adv. Mehboob Hasan
Respondent(s)
Abdul Gufur and others
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Addl Civil Judge (J.D.) Court No-2
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Restored
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 20-11-2025 | Hearing | |
| 30-10-2025 | Hearing | |
| 18-09-2025 | Restored | |
| 18-09-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The civil suit (Case No. 104/2020) filed by Rafeeullshan and others against Abdul Gafoor and others was dismissed under Order 7 Rule 11(D) CPC on 20-08-2024. The court found that the plaintiff's name is not recorded in revenue records for the disputed agricultural land, and the question of ownership remains undetermined in pending revenue court proceedings. Since the plaintiff lacks prima facie recorded title, the court held that the suit for cancellation of sale deed must be dismissed, and the plaintiff should first establish ownership through the revenue court under Section 206 of the UP Revenue Code 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The civil suit (Case No. 104/2020) filed by Rafeeullshan and others against Abdul Gafoor and others was dismissed under Order 7 Rule 11(D) CPC on 20-08-2024. The court found that the plaintiff's name is not recorded in revenue records for the disputed agricultural land, and the question of ownership remains undetermined in pending revenue court proceedings. Since the plaintiff lacks prima facie recorded title, the court held that the suit for cancellation of sale deed must be dismissed, and the plaintiff should first establish ownership through the revenue court under Section 206 of the UP Revenue Code 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts