SUSHILA DEVI vs RAMPAL SINGH — 414/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Issues Next hearing 06-May-2026 this date has passed

Civil Suit

CNR: UPAU120022912023

Filing Number

512/2023

Filing Date

11-Jul-2023

Registration No

414/2023

Registration Date

11-Jul-2023

Court

Civil Judge Jr. Division, Bidhuna

Judge

1-Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHILA DEVI

    Adv. GAMBHIR SINGH SHAKYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMPAL SINGH

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  4. 19-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  5. 23-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  6. 22-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Civil Case No. 414/2023 | Sushila Devi v. Rampal Singh | Dated: 22.08.2025 Court: Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bidhuna, Auraya Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction (Prayer Petition No. 6) is dismissed/rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, which is the foundational requirement for granting interim injunctions. Consequently, the balance of convenience and irreparable injury arguments became immaterial and could not support the injunction request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 22-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  8. 06-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  9. 24-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  10. 09-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  11. 30-May-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  12. 22-May-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  13. 02-May-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  14. 28-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  15. 24-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  16. 19-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  17. 14-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  18. 06-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  19. 25-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  20. 14-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  21. 21-May-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  22. 15-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  23. 12-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  24. 20-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  25. 30-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  26. 11-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  27. 04-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

  28. 26-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 11-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 414/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Civil Case No. 414/2023 | Sushila Devi v. Rampal Singh | Dated: 22.08.2025 Court: Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bidhuna, Auraya Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction (Prayer Petition No. 6) is dismissed/rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, which is the foundational requirement for granting interim injunctions. Consequently, the balance of convenience and irreparable injury arguments became immaterial and could not support the injunction request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case